Democrats have long stated, “There is no voter fraud.” But the overabundance of fraud reports and convictions forced them to concede it exist but now add the caveat “but not to the extend that would change the outcome of an election.” But how do they know? This Democrat was found guilty of voter fraud. The tip off causing the investigation was votes counted was much greater than the number of people listed as voting. And this apparently happens in many States.
Using information initially gathered by the Voter Reference Foundation from 17 State governments, the Center for Election Integrity looked at the difference between the number of votes counted and number of voters. The information provided by those 17 States showed there were a total of 914,734 more votes cast than people who voted. How is this possible? How could these votes be legitimate? Why isn’t this the subject of a major investigation?
It was claimed ballots for a specific candidate were being run through the counting machines multiple times. This would explain why there were more votes counted than people who voted. A recount of the paper ballots should equal the final vote count. But that can’t happen. The ballots were destroyed. Which violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that requires all documents related to Federal elections be maintained for 22 months after the election!
So, who has gone to jail for a year and been fined $1,000 for deleting Federal election records? No one. Georgia is one of many States that violated this law. Other States do the same thing. The government writes laws to protect citizens rights, then apparently ignore them when doing so benefits them. Why else would they not enforce it? Why is having more votes than voters and illegally destroying Federal election records not important to election integrity?
Twenty-one States require a photo ID to vote including Michigan. Photo ID’s may prevent people from voting illegally, but it didn’t prevent the casting of 280,605 votes for which there was no voter. It’s doubtful a voter could enter the polls and cast a ballot without it being documented. So where did these “extra” votes come from? Shouldn’t we be finding out? Until we know, election results will always be suspect.
I posted an abbreviated version of this article on Facebook and received the following comment:
My reply to Ms. McCall:
Which “Big Lie” are you talking about? Trump’s “Big Lie” that the 2020 election was stolen from him or Hillary’s “Big Lie” that Russian collusion cost her the 2016 election? It’s been proven that there was no Russian collusion in the 2016 election. It won’t be possible for Trump to prove the 2020 election was stolen from him. Many of the election records for the 2020 election were destroyed well before the end of the required 22 month retention period (which was last month). And as also noted, violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
I never mentioned Trump, the “Big Lie” or not accepting the outcome of the 2020 election. My concern is election integrity. Seventeen States had almost a million more votes counted than voters documented as voting. If this same ratio of votes counted to voters documented is applied to the other 33 States, you end up with nearly 3 million more votes cast than voters documented as voting. Is this acceptable? I would like to know how this is even possible! Wouldn’t you? If Trump had won by three million votes would it matter then?